Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries.

Hip fracture registries have helped improve quality of care and reduce variability, and several audits exist worldwide. The results of the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry are presented and compared with 13 other national registries, highlighting similarities and differences to define areas of improvement, particularly surgical delay and early mobilization. INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture audits have been useful for monitoring current practice and defining areas in need of improvement. Most established registries are from Northern Europe. We present the results from the first annual report of the Spanish Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) and compare them with other publically available audit reports. METHOD: Comparison of the results from Spain with the most recent reports from another ten established hip fracture registries highlights the differences in audit characteristics, casemix, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the patients treated in 54 hospitals, 7.208 were included in the registry between January and October 2017. Compared with other registries, the RNFC included patients ≥ 75 years old; in general, they were older, more likely to be female, had a worse prefracture ambulation status, and were more likely to have extracapsular fractures. A larger proportion was treated with intramedullary nails than in other countries, and spinal anesthesia was most commonly used. With a mean of 75.7 h, Spain had by far the longest surgical delay, and the lowest proportion of patients mobilized on the first postoperative day (58.5%). Consequently, development of pressure ulcers was high, but length of stay, mortality, and discharge to home remained in the range of other audits. CONCLUSIONS: National hip fracture registries have proved effective in changing clinical practice and our understanding of patients with this condition. Such registries tend to be based on an internationally recognized common dataset which would make comparisons between national registries possible, but variations such as age inclusion criteria and follow-up are becoming evident across the world. This variation should be avoided if we are to maximize the comparability of registry results and help different countries learn from each other's practice. The results reported in the Spanish RNFC, compared with those of other countries, highlight the differences between countries and detect areas of improvement, particularly surgical delay and early mobilization.

Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (SNHFR): a description of its objectives, methodology and implementation / Registro Nacional Español de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC): descripción de sus objetivos, metodología e implementación

Objective: To ascertain the current situation and clinical variability of the provision of care for Hip Fracture (HF) in Spain and the factors related to it by using a National Registry (NHFR) with high patient numbers and territorial representation NHFR, and to compare results on a national and international level and propose standards and criteria to improve healthcare quality. Design: Continuous registry for at least three years of a representative sample of patients admitted to Spanish hospitals due to HF using the Minimum Common Dataset - international Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) MCD, adapted for Spanish. Study scope and subjects: all patients over the age of 74 years who are hospitalized with a diagnosis of a fragility HF at the participating hospitals distributed throughout the Spanish territory. Initially 48 hospitals are included, and we expect to incorporate the highest number of sites possible. Results: It is expected to ascertain the current situation of provision of care for HF in Spain. Each hospital will be offered information regarding their results and their situation compared to the rest. The results from national hospitals will be compared to others included in the registry and to hospitals abroad, which use the same database. Variability will be studied, care standards will be established, and objectives will be proposed for the continuous improvement of the care process of this condition

Objetivo: Conocer la situación actual y la variabilidad clínica del proceso asistencial a la Fractura de Cadera (FC) en España y los factores relacionados con la misma mediante la utilización de un Registro Nacional (RNFC) con elevada casuística y representación territorial RNFC, así como comparar resultados en el ámbito nacional e internacional y proponer estándares y criterios para mejorar la calidad asistencial. Diseño: Registro continuo durante al menos tres años de una muestra representativa de los pacientes ingresados por FC en los hospitales españoles mediante el Minimum Common Dataset - MCD internacional de la Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) adaptado al castellano. Ámbito y sujetos del estudio: se incluirán todos los pacientes mayores de 74 años hospitalizados con el diagnóstico de FC por fragilidad en los hospitales participantes repartidos por el territorio español. Inicialmente están incluidos 48 hospitales, a los que se espera que se vayan incorporando el mayor número posible de centros. Resultados: Se pretende conocer la situación actual de la atención a este proceso en España Se ofrecerá a cada hospital la información de sus resultados y su situación en relación al resto, se compararán los resultados de los hospitales nacionales entre sí y con los hospitales extranjeros incluidos en registros que usan la misma base de datos. Se estudiará la variabilidad, se establecerán estándares asistenciales y se plantearán objetivos para la mejora continua del proceso en la atención a esta patología

Evaluación clínica de pacientes con fractura de cadera aislada y asociada a fractura de miembro superior / Clinical assessment of patients with isolated hip fractures associated with an upper limb fracture

Introducción: Hay una proporción de pacientes con fractura de cadera que tienen una fractura de miembro superior concomitante. Queremos conocer si estos pacientes muestran un peor nivel funcional y si presentan diferencias en distintos parámetros clínicos con respecto a los que tienen una fractura aislada de cadera. Material y métodos: Se han revisado retrospectivamente 1.061 informes de alta de la Unidad de Ortogeriatría del H. U. La Paz de Madrid. Se recopiló información sobre distintos parámetros clínicos de las fracturas presentadas. Posteriormente se comparó el grupo de fractura asociada con el de fractura aislada mediante un análisis estadístico. Resultados: Se detectaron 44 pacientes con una fractura de miembro superior asociada, el 90,9% fueron mujeres (40) y la media de edad fue de 84,45años. El 81,8% de las fracturas de miembro superior fueron de radio distal o de húmero proximal. La demora quirúrgica fue de 2,60días y la estancia media hospitalaria, de 12,30días. El 64,3% fueron intervenciones con clavo-tornillo y el 31%, artroplastias. La media del índice de Barthel fue de 84,88 (p=0,021). El 52,5% de los pacientes del grupo a estudio fueron derivados a un centro de apoyo funcional (p=0,03). La mortalidad global intrahospitalaria fue del 4,2%, sin diferencias entre los grupos. Conclusiones: Los pacientes que presentan una fractura asociada tienen mayor capacidad funcional previa y son más independientes. Tras la fractura necesitan una mayor ayuda por parte del sistema sanitario para su óptima recuperación funcional

Introduction: Some patients with a hip fracture also present a concomitant upper limb fracture. We want to know whether these patients have a worse functional level and whether they have any differences in various clinical parameters compared with patients with an isolated hip fracture. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1061 discharge reports from the Orthogeriatrics Unit. We collected information on several clinical parameters of the fractures. Subsequently, we performed a statistical analysis of the data by comparing the associated fracture group with the isolated fracture group. Results: We detected 44 patients with associated upper limb fracture, 90.9% were women (40) and the average age was 84.45years. Eighty-one point eight percent of the upper limb fractures were distal radius or proximal humerus. Pertrochanteric fractures were the most common (none of them were subtrochanteric fractures). Surgical delay was 2.60days and the average hospital stay was 12.30days. Sixty-four point three percent were nail surgery and 31% arthroplasty. The mean Barthel index score was 84.88 (P=.021). Fifty-two point 5 percent of the patients in the study group were referred to a functional support unit (P=.03). The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.2%, with no differences between groups. Conclusions: Patients with an associated fracture have a higher previous functional capacity and they are more independent. Nevertheless, after the fracture they need more help from the healthcare system for optimal functional recovery

Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (SNHFR): a description of its objectives, methodology and implementation.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the current situation and clinical variability of the provision of care for Hip Fracture (HF) in Spain and the factors related to it by using a National Registry (NHFR) with high patient numbers and territorial representation NHFR, and to compare results on a national and international level and propose standards and criteria to improve healthcare quality. DESIGN: Continuous registry for at least three years of a representative sample of patients admitted to Spanish hospitals due to HF using the Minimum Common Dataset - international Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) MCD, adapted for Spanish. STUDY SCOPE AND SUBJECTS: all patients over the age of 74 years who are hospitalized with a diagnosis of a fragility HF at the participating hospitals distributed throughout the Spanish territory. Initially 48 hospitals are included, and we expect to incorporate the highest number of sites possible. RESULTS: It is expected to ascertain the current situation of provision of care for HF in Spain. Each hospital will be offered information regarding their results and their situation compared to the rest. The results from national hospitals will be compared to others included in the registry and to hospitals abroad, which use the same database. Variability will be studied, care standards will be established, and objectives will be proposed for the continuous improvement of the care process of this condition.

Clinical assessment of patients with isolated hip fractures associated with an upper limb fracture. / Evaluación clínica de pacientes con fractura de cadera aislada y asociada a fractura de miembro superior.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients with a hip fracture also present a concomitant upper limb fracture. We want to know whether these patients have a worse functional level and whether they have any differences in various clinical parameters compared with patients with an isolated hip fracture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1061 discharge reports from the Orthogeriatrics Unit. We collected information on several clinical parameters of the fractures. Subsequently, we performed a statistical analysis of the data by comparing the associated fracture group with the isolated fracture group. RESULTS: We detected 44 patients with associated upper limb fracture, 90.9% were women (40) and the average age was 84.45years. Eighty-one point eight percent of the upper limb fractures were distal radius or proximal humerus. Pertrochanteric fractures were the most common (none of them were subtrochanteric fractures). Surgical delay was 2.60days and the average hospital stay was 12.30days. Sixty-four point three percent were nail surgery and 31% arthroplasty. The mean Barthel index score was 84.88 (P=.021). Fifty-two point 5 percent of the patients in the study group were referred to a functional support unit (P=.03). The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.2%, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an associated fracture have a higher previous functional capacity and they are more independent. Nevertheless, after the fracture they need more help from the healthcare system for optimal functional recovery.

[Fragile hip fracture in Mexico: Where are we today? Where do we want to go?] / Fractura de cadera por fragilidad en México: ¿En dónde estamos hoy? ¿Hacia dónde queremos ir?

INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture is considered the most serious consequence of falls and osteoporosis. 18% of women will suffer one and 25% die in the first year. Only 73% of survivors will walk as they did previously. We know little about the assistance and evolution of it in Mexico. Our goal was to review the current state of Mexican literature on hip fracture, compare Mexican studies with each other and with quality indicators. METHODS: We conducted a search of Mexican articles published between 2000-2017 with the key words: hip fracture, elderly, Mexico and hip fracture (in English) in the databases PubMed, EBSCO and Bibliomed. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles were included. No clinical trials, multidisciplinary unit reports, records, or meta-analyses were found. The average age was 76.9 years and 67.2% were women. No papers were found to report quality indicators. Comorbidity is reported little. The most common complications of hip fractures were delirium, pneumonia and pressure ulcers. Mortality in the acute phase was 0.97 to 12.5%. Special units were not reported. The cost of care oscillated between 1,261 and 13,641 USD. CONCLUSIONS: The scientific information on hip fractures in Mexico is sparse, heterogeneous and does not allow for conclusive results. Increasing the amount and quality of research in hip fractures in Mexico is required. It would also be advisable to disseminate the usefulness of multidisciplinary teams and registry of hip fractures, which would help to improve attention.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La fractura de cadera (FC) se considera la consecuencia más grave de las caídas y la osteoporosis. Dieciocho por ciento de las mujeres sufrirán una FC y 25% muere en el primer año. Sólo 73% de los supervivientes caminará como lo hacía previamente. Conocemos poco de la asistencia y evolución de la FC en México. OBJETIVO: Revisar el estado actual de la literatura mexicana sobre FC, comparar estudios mexicanos entre sí y con los indicadores de calidad. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos mexicanos publicados entre 2000 y 2017 con las palabras clave: fractura de cadera, ancianos, México y hip fracture en las bases de datos PubMed, EBSCO y Bibliomed. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 22 artículos. No se encontraron ensayos clínicos, informes de unidades multidisciplinarias, registros, ni metaanálisis. La media de edad fue de 76.9 años y 67.2% fueron mujeres. No se encontraron trabajos que reportaran indicadores de calidad. La comorbilidad se describe poco. Las complicaciones más frecuentes de la FC fueron delirium, neumonía y úlceras por presión. La mortalidad en la fase aguda fue de 0.97 a 12.5%. No se reportaron unidades ortogeriátricas. El costo de atención osciló entre 1,261 y 13,641 dólares estadounidenses (USD). CONCLUSIONES: La información científica sobre FC en México es escasa, heterogénea y no permite obtener resultados concluyentes. Se requiere aumentar la cantidad y la calidad de la investigación en FC en México. Sería también conveniente difundir la utilidad de los equipos multidisciplinarios y registros de FC, lo que contribuiría a mejorar la atención.

Consenso GEDOS-SECOT sobre el proceso de atención a pacientes con artrosis de rodilla e indicación de artroplastia / GEDOS-SECOT consensus on the care process of patients with knee osteoarthritis and arthoplasty

Objetivo. Desarrollar recomendaciones sobre el proceso de evaluación y manejo del paciente con artrosis de rodilla e indicación de artroplastia basadas en la mejor evidencia científica disponible y la experiencia de un panel de expertos. Métodos. Se seleccionó un grupo multidisciplinar de 12 expertos que definieron: alcance, usuarios, apartados del documento, revisiones sistemáticas a realizar y a quienes se asignaron tareas. Se realizaron 3 revisiones sistemáticas en pacientes con indicación de artroplastia de rodilla sobre: 1) eficacia y seguridad de los protocolos de fast-track; 2) papel de las intervenciones cognitivo-conductuales en sujetos con catastrofismo, y 3) efecto del control del dolor agudo posquirúrgico en los resultados. Se realizaron 2 revisiones narrativas sobre la sensibilización central en este grupo y sobre la eficacia de la rehabilitación preoperatoria. Los expertos redactaron los apartados y generaron las recomendaciones. Estas recomendaciones se consensuaron mediante la metodología Delphi en un grupo multidisciplinar de 85 expertos. Se estableció también el nivel de evidencia de cada recomendación. Resultados. Se generaron 20 recomendaciones. Todas alcanzaron un nivel de acuerdo mayor del 80%. El mayor acuerdo se alcanzó en la necesidad de realizar informe de alta completo, en informar adecuadamente al paciente sobre el proceso y en seguir las recomendaciones de las guías clínicas disponibles. Conclusiones. Existe consenso entre los responsables del manejo de los pacientes con artrosis de rodilla e indicación de artroplastia en que es necesario protocolizar el proceso de sustitución articular, realizando una correcta evaluación y seguimiento del paciente, de forma integral y coordinada y con especial atención al procedimiento quirúrgico y al postoperatorio (AU)

Objective. To develop recommendations on the evaluation and management procedure in patients undergoing total knee replacement based on best evidence and the experience of a panel of experts. Methods. A multidisciplinary group of 12 experts was selected that defined the scope, users and the document parts. Three systematic reviews were performed in patients undergoing knee replacement: (I) efficacy and safety of fast-tracks; (II) efficacy and safety of cognitive interventions in patients with catastrophic pain, and (III) efficacy and safety of acute post-surgical pain management on post-surgical outcomes. A narrative review was conducted on the evaluation and management of pain sensitization, and about the efficacy and safety of pre-surgical physiotherapy. The experts generated the recommendations and explicative text. The level of agreement was evaluated in a multidisciplinary group of 85 experts with the Delphi technique. The level of evidence was established as well for each recommendation. Results. A total of 20 recommendations were produced. An agreement higher than 80% was reached in all of them. We found the highest agreement on the need for a full discharge report, on providing proper information about the process and on following available guidelines. Conclusions. There is consensus among professionals involved in the management of patients undergoing total knee replacement, in that it is important to protocolize the replacement process, performing a proper, integrated and coordinated patient evaluation and follow-up, paying special attention to the surgical procedure and postoperative period (AU)

GEDOS-SECOT consensus on the care process of patients with knee osteoarthritis and arthoplasty. / Consenso GEDOS-SECOT sobre el proceso de atención a pacientes con artrosis de rodilla e indicación de artroplastia.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations on the evaluation and management procedure in patients undergoing total knee replacement based on best evidence and the experience of a panel of experts. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of 12 experts was selected that defined the scope, users and the document parts. Three systematic reviews were performed in patients undergoing knee replacement: (i)efficacy and safety of fast-tracks; (ii)efficacy and safety of cognitive interventions in patients with catastrophic pain, and (iii) efficacy and safety of acute post-surgical pain management on post-surgical outcomes. A narrative review was conducted on the evaluation and management of pain sensitization, and about the efficacy and safety of pre-surgical physiotherapy. The experts generated the recommendations and explicative text. The level of agreement was evaluated in a multidisciplinary group of 85 experts with the Delphi technique. The level of evidence was established as well for each recommendation. RESULTS: A total of 20 recommendations were produced. An agreement higher than 80% was reached in all of them. We found the highest agreement on the need for a full discharge report, on providing proper information about the process and on following available guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: There is consensus among professionals involved in the management of patients undergoing total knee replacement, in that it is important to protocolize the replacement process, performing a proper, integrated and coordinated patient evaluation and follow-up, paying special attention to the surgical procedure and postoperative period.

Guía SECOT-GEIOS en osteoporosis y fractura por fragilidad. Actualización / SECOT-GEIOS guidelines in osteoporosis and fragility fracture. An update

No disponible

Consenso SECOT-GEDOS sobre el control del dolor prequirúrgico en artrosis de rodilla y cadera / SECOT-GEDOS consensus on pre-surgical pain management in knee and hip arthrosis

Objetivo: Desarrollar recomendaciones basadas en la mejor evidencia y experiencia sobre el manejo del dolor en pacientes con artrosis de rodilla o cadera e indicación de artroplastia. Métodos: Las recomendaciones se emitieron siguiendo la metodología de grupos nominales. Se seleccionó un grupo director de expertos (5 traumatólogos y un anestesiólogo) que definieron el alcance, usuarios, apartados del documento, posibles recomendaciones, revisiones sistemáticas y se asignaron tareas. Se realizaron 3 revisiones sistemáticas sobre: la eficacia y seguridad de la analgesia prequirúrgica en relación al dolor posquirúrgico; la eficacia y seguridad de la analgesia preventiva, y sobre los factores prequirúrgicos que influyen en el dolor posquirúrgico. Los expertos redactaron los apartados y generaron las recomendaciones correspondientes. El nivel de evidencia y grado de recomendación se clasificaron según el modelo del Center for Evidence Based Medicine de Oxford y el grado de acuerdo por técnica Delphi (2 rondas). El Delphi se amplió a 39 traumatólogos y anestesiólogos. El documento completo circuló entre el grupo director para su última revisión. Resultados: Se generaron 21 recomendaciones. Incluye el manejo farmacológico específico, la evaluación y monitorización de estos pacientes que están en tratamiento, y el tratamiento preventivo del dolor posquirúrgico. Existió consenso mayor del 70% en 19 de ellas. Conclusiones: En el paciente pendiente de artroplastia de cadera o rodilla se debe hacer una correcta evaluación, seguimiento y manejo farmacológico y no farmacológico de los factores que predicen un mal resultado de la intervención, en particular del dolor prequirúrgico. Estas actuaciones pueden mejorar el dolor posquirúrgico y el resultado de la artroplastia (AU)

Objective: To develop recommendations, based on best evidence and experience, on pain management in patients undertaking total knee or hip replacement. Methods: Nominal group methodology was followed. A group of experts was selected (5 orthopedics, 1 anesthesiologist), who defined the scope, users, topics, preliminary recommendations, and 3 systematic reviews: efficacy and safety of pre-surgical analgesia regarding to post-surgical pain, efficacy and safety of pre-emptive analgesia and pre-operative factors of post-operative pain. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, and the level of agreement with the Delphi technique (2 rounds). The Delphi was extended to 39 orthopedics and anesthesiologists. The whole document was reviewed by all the experts. Results: A total of 21 recommendations were produced. They include specific pharmacological treatment, as well as the evaluation and monitoring of patients on this treatment, and post-operative pre-emptive treatment. Agreement above 70% was reached in 19 recommendations. Conclusions: In patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement, a proper evaluation, follow-up, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of predictors of poor surgical outcomes should be performed, especially those related to pre-operative pain. This can improve post-operative pain and surgery outcomes (AU)

SECOT-GEDOS consensus on pre-surgical pain management in knee and hip arthrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations, based on best evidence and experience, on pain management in patients undertaking total knee or hip replacement. METHODS: Nominal group methodology was followed. A group of experts was selected (5 orthopedics, 1 anesthesiologist), who defined the scope, users, topics, preliminary recommendations, and 3 systematic reviews: efficacy and safety of pre-surgical analgesia regarding to post-surgical pain, efficacy and safety of pre-emptive analgesia and pre-operative factors of post-operative pain. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, and the level of agreement with the Delphi technique (2 rounds). The Delphi was extended to 39 orthopedics and anesthesiologists. The whole document was reviewed by all the experts. RESULTS: A total of 21 recommendations were produced. They include specific pharmacological treatment, as well as the evaluation and monitoring of patients on this treatment, and post-operative pre-emptive treatment. Agreement above 70% was reached in 19 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement, a proper evaluation, follow-up, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of predictors of poor surgical outcomes should be performed, especially those related to pre-operative pain. This can improve post-operative pain and surgery outcomes.

Modulación del crecimiento de columnas escolióticas en animales de experimentación mediante el uso de barras de metal inteligente / Modulation of scoliotic spine growth in experimental animals using intelligent metal bars

Objetivo. Creación de un modelo experimental de escoliosis estructurada en ratas para evaluar la eficacia de los metales con memoria de forma para corregir gradualmente la deformidad a lo largo del tiempo. Material y método. Se generó una escoliosis experimental en ratas de 3 semanas mediante una sutura entre escápula y pelvis izquierdas durante 8 semanas, tras lo cual fueron aleatorizadas en 2 grupos: control, en los que se cortó la sutura, y nitinol, en los que además se implantó un alambre recto con memoria de forma anclado a la columna. Se realizaron radiografías seriadas para determinar la eficacia del nitinol en la corrección de la escoliosis. En un segundo tiempo, evaluamos los cambios histológicos a nivel del cuerpo vertebral apical y discos adyacentes pre y poscorrección. Resultados. Se indujo una cifoescoliosis progresiva media de 81,5°. En el grupo control, tras cortar la sutura, se produjo una reducción inicial de la deformidad pero luego permaneció estable a lo largo del tiempo (54° a las 2 semanas). En el grupo nitinol se observó una reducción progresiva del valor angular de la escoliosis, hasta 8,7° de media a las 2 semanas. El acuñamiento del cuerpo vertebral apical y de los discos adyacentes se corregía parcialmente tras 2 semanas de corrección de la deformidad. Conclusión. En este modelo de escoliosis, un alambre recto de nitinol anclado a la columna ha demostrado eficacia para la corrección gradual de la cifoescoliosis, y de los cambios estructurales asociados a la misma (AU)

Objective: To create an experimental structural scoliosis model in mice to evaluate the efficacy of shape-memory metals to gradually correct the deformity over time. Material and method: Experimental scoliosis was generated in 3 week-old mice by means of a suture between the left scapula and pelvis for 8 weeks. They were then randomised into two groups: a control group, in which the suture was cut, and another, in those that also had a Nitinol straight memory-wire implant fixed to the column. Serial X-rays were performed to determine the efficacy of the Nitinol in the correction of the scoliosis. In a second time, the histological changes at apical vertical body level and the adjacent discs were evaluated preand post-correction. Results: A mean 81.5◦ kyphoscoliosis was gradually induced. In the control group, after cutting the suture, an initial reduction in the deformity was observed, but later it remained stable throughout the time (54◦ at two weeks). In the Nitinol group, a gradual reduction was observed in the scoliosis angle value, to a mean of 8.7◦ at two weeks. The curvature of the apical vertebral body and adjacent discs were partially corrected after two weeks of correcting the deformity. Conclusion: This scoliosis model has demonstrated the efficacy of a straight Nitinol wire fixed to the spinal column in the gradual correction of kyphoscoliosis and in the changes in its adjacent structures (AU)

[Modulation of scoliotic spine growth in experimental animals using intelligent metal bars]. / Modulación del crecimiento de columnas escolióticas en animales de experimentación mediante el uso de barras de metal inteligente.

OBJECTIVE: To create an experimental structural scoliosis model in mice to evaluate the efficacy of shape-memory metals to gradually correct the deformity over time. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Experimental scoliosis was generated in 3 week-old mice by means of a suture between the left scapula and pelvis for 8 weeks. They were then randomised into two groups: a control group, in which the suture was cut, and another, in those that also had a Nitinol straight memory-wire implant fixed to the column. Serial X-rays were performed to determine the efficacy of the Nitinol in the correction of the scoliosis. In a second time, the histological changes at apical vertical body level and the adjacent discs were evaluated pre- and post-correction. RESULTS: A mean 81.5° kyphoscoliosis was gradually induced. In the control group, after cutting the suture, an initial reduction in the deformity was observed, but later it remained stable throughout the time (54° at two weeks). In the Nitinol group, a gradual reduction was observed in the scoliosis angle value, to a mean of 8.7° at two weeks. The curvature of the apical vertebral body and adjacent discs were partially corrected after two weeks of correcting the deformity. CONCLUSION: This scoliosis model has demonstrated the efficacy of a straight Nitinol wire fixed to the spinal column in the gradual correction of kyphoscoliosis and in the changes in its adjacent structures.

[Medial versus lateral plating in distal tibial fractures: a prospective study of 40 fractures]. / Placas mediales versus laterales para las fracturas de pilón tibial: estudio prospectivo de 40 fracturas.

OBJECTIVE: Tibial plafond fractures are one of the most challenging injuries in orthopaedic surgery. Their results could be improved by following the new guidelines for the management, and modern plating techniques. The results and complication rate between anteromedial and anterolateral approach for open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures were compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A study was conducted on 40 patients treated by open reduction an internal fixation between 2007 and 2008. The surgical approach was selected by the surgeon in charge, depending on fracture pattern and skin situation. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically by an independent orthopaedic surgeon, not involved in the surgical procedure, using clinical (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score) and radiological criteria at a minimum of two years. The appearance of complications after both approaches was recorded. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. The mean age was 53 years, with 24 males and 16 females. Seventeen of the injuries were of high energy, and there were 8 open fractures (3 of type i, 4 type ii and one type iii), and 12 of the closed injuries were grade ii or iii in the Tscherne classification. Six patients (15%) had associated injuries. At final follow-up there were 33 (82%) excellent or good results. No statistical differences were found between either surgical approach regarding time to bone union, rate of delayed union and infection rate. Three plates of the anteromedial group and none of the anterolateral group needed to be removed. CONCLUSION: Open reduction and internal fixation of distal tibia fractures produced reliable results, with no statistical differences found between anteromedial and anterolateral surgical approaches. Clinical and radiological results and complication rate were mainly related to the fracture type.

Placas mediales versus laterales para las fracturas de pilón tibial: estudio prospectivo de 40 fracturas / Medial versus lateral plating in distal tibial fractures: A prospective study of 40 fractures

Objetivo. Las fracturas de pilón tibial constituyen una de las lesiones más difíciles de tratar en cirugía ortopédica. Los nuevos protocolos y las modernas placas pueden mejorar los resultados. Comparamos los resultados y la tasa de complicaciones entre el abordaje anteromedial y anterolateral para la reducción abierta y fijación interna. Material y métodos. Se estudiaron de forma prospectiva 40 pacientes tratados mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna entre 2007 y 2008. El abordaje fue seleccionado por el cirujano, dependiendo del patrón de fractura y de la situación de la piel. Los pacientes fueron evaluados clínica y radiológicamente por un cirujano independiente, utilizando criterios clínicos (puntuación de la Sociedad Americana de Ortopedia de Pie y Tobillo) y radiológicos a un mínimo de 2 años. Se registró la aparición de complicaciones de ambos abordajes. Resultados. Cuarenta pacientes fueron incluidos. La media de edad fue de 53 años, había 24 hombres y 16 mujeres, 17 fracturas fueron de alta energía y hubo 8 abiertas (3 de tipo i , 4 de tipo ii I y una de tipo iii ), y 12 de las lesiones cerradas eran de grado ii o iii de la clasificación de Tscherne. Seis pacientes (15%) presentaron lesiones asociadas. Al final del seguimiento hubo 33 (82%) resultados excelentes o buenos. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticas entre ambos abordajes con respecto al tiempo de consolidación, tasa de retardo de consolidación y tasa de infección. Fueron extraídas tres placas anteromediales y ninguna anterolateral. Conclusión. La reducción abierta y fijación interna de la fractura de pilón tibial proporciona buenos resultados; no se pudo encontrar diferencias estadísticas entre los abordajes anteromedial y anterolateral. Los resultados clínicos y radiológicos y la tasa de complicaciones se relacionan principalmente con el tipo de fractura (AU)

Objective. Tibial plafond fractures are one of the most challenging injuries in orthopaedic surgery. Their results could be improved by following the new guidelines for the management, and modern plating techniques. The results and complication rate between anteromedial and anterolateral approach for open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures were compared. Material and methods. A study was conducted on 40 patients treated by open reduction an internal fixation between 2007 and 2008. The surgical approach was selected by the surgeon in charge, depending on fracture pattern and skin situation. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically by an independent orthopaedic surgeon, not involved in the surgical procedure, using clinical (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score) and radiological criteria at a minimum of two years. The appearance of complications after both approaches was recorded. Results. Forty patients were included. The mean age was 53 years, with 24 males and 16 females. Seventeen of the injuries were of high energy, and there were 8 open fractures (3 of type i , 4 type ii and one type iii ), and 12 of the closed injuries were grade ii or iii in the Tscherne classification. Six patients (15%) had associated injuries. At final follow-up there were 33 (82%) excellent or good results. No statistical differences were found between either surgical approach regarding time to bone union, rate of delayed union and infection rate. Three plates of the anteromedial group and none of the anterolateral group needed to be removed. Conclusion. Open reduction and internal fixation of distal tibia fractures produced reliable results, with no statistical differences found between anteromedial and anterolateral surgical approaches. Clinical and radiological results and complication rate were mainly related to the fracture type (AU)

¿Revisando conceptos? / Reviewing concepts?

No disponible